Video · 5 October 2026 · 1 min read

How AI Changes Product and Developer Teamwork

Abdul Osama (عبدول أسامة) describes AI as changing how teammates divide and coordinate work, rather than replacing them. On a side project, he and his co-founder prepared the product concept and design system, then answered Claude Code’s questions together from product and technical perspectives.

Key takeaways

The team prepared a product research document before moving into design and development.
The design system and written concept became inputs for the technical work.
Both teammates answered Claude Code’s questions, each bringing a different perspective.
The time estimate is one project experience, not a promised result for other teams.

AI can help product and development teammates move faster while keeping decisions in human hands. Abdul Osama (عبدول أسامة) describes a side project in which he handled the product and design perspective while his co-founder covered the technical side using Claude Code, an AI tool that helps developers work with code.

How the workflow unfolded

The pair wrote down the product idea, compared it with alternatives, and prepared a product research document. They chose a name and bought a domain. Abdul then created a design system—a set of reusable interface elements and rules for consistency—using something he calls Claude Design. The tool’s exact name needs confirmation.

He exported the design system and the written content explaining the idea, then handed them to his co-founder. In a later working session, the co-founder shared his screen in Cursor, a code editor with AI features. They answered Claude Code’s questions and made decisions together.

| Role in the session | Contribution Abdul describes | |---|---| | Co-founder | Covered technical considerations as a developer | | Abdul | Considered decisions as a product manager or owner |

We answer Claude Code’s questions together. — Abdul Osama

In numbers

Abdul says a portion of the work that might previously have taken weeks was completed in two sessions.
He estimates about two to three hours per session. These figures describe his team’s experience with that portion of the project, not a guaranteed timeline.

What should a team do next?

The lesson is not to leave AI to make the decisions. Abdul encourages teams to stay open to new ways of collaborating: prepare clear inputs, bring product and technical perspectives into the same working session, and decide together how to proceed.

Questions and answers

Does Abdul say AI replaces team members?

No. He describes himself and his co-founder continuing to work and decide together, but faster.

What did the team prepare before the coding session?

They documented and researched the product idea, then prepared a design system and written content explaining the concept.

How did the team use Claude Code?

They answered its questions together. The co-founder covered technical issues while Abdul considered the product perspective.

How long did the work Abdul describes take?

He says that portion took two sessions of roughly two to three hours each, rather than the weeks he thought it might otherwise require.

Sources and tools mentioned

Full transcript

اللي بيحصل دلوقتي في الماركت إن طريقة الشغل بتختلف حتى جوه التيمز، يعني هديكم مثال بسيط، أنا والكو-فاوندر شغالين مع بعض على برودكت على جنب كده، فأول حاجة عملناها إن احنا بعد ما كتبنا الفكرة وقاريناها وعملنا برودكت ريسيرش دوكيومنت، خلاص عرفنا هنسميه ايه واشترينا الدومين إلى آخره، أول حاجة الشغل كان عندي أنا، رحنا على حاجة زي كلود ديزاين، عملنا ديزاين سيستم، وبعد ما خلصنا الديزاين سيستم عملت إكسبورت للديزاين سيستم وعملت إكسبورت لكل الكونتنت اللي مكتوب فيه الفكرة وديته لآلي، والنهاردة تاني سيشن شغالين مع بعض على ايه بقى، هو عمللي شير على كرسر بس هو بقى ديفيلوبر بقى فبيحب يخبي الحاجة، فعمل، فعمل، أول ما كان عامللي شير سكرين دلوقتي، أول ما عملت بتاعها مخبك كود، دلوقتي اللي بيحصلنا نحن دخلين سيشن مع بعض فبنرد على أسئلة كلود كود مع بعض، هو من الناحية التكنيكل عشان يغطي كل حاجة، وأنا أكيني برودكت مانجر أو برودكت اونر هنا، وبنجاوب مع بعض وبنقرر كل حاجة، لما الجزئية دي تخلص لحد كبير هيبقى الشغلة كله عند عالي، هو بيستخدم كلود كود فبيتحرك أسرع، حاجة كان ممكن عشان بس نقطع شدها محتاجين فيها أسابيع، خلصناها في قعدتين كل عادة فيهم مثلا ساعتين تلاتة صفور، ده التغيرات اللي هتحصل، ده اللي الـ AI هيعمل، لا قعدني ولا قعد عالي في البيت، بالعكس شغالين مع بعض أسرع، وحاجات ممكن كنا زمان لا نجرؤ إن احنا نحاول نعملها في وسط الزحمة، دلوقتي بنحاول نعملها واحنا شغالين عادي، فالأمور سهلة وبسيطة، خليكم إيجابيين تجاه الـ AI وشوفوا إزاي التيمز هتشتغل مع بعض بشكل مختلف في الفترة الجاية عشان تنتج أكتر وتبقى أشطر وأذكى.

This text was written with AI from the video and may contain small transcription errors. · Markdown version

Watch next

Building a learning platform with Claude Code

Abdul Osama (عبدول أسامة) used AI to build his learning platform, starting with a visual identity in Claude Design and moving to Claude Code after an initial landing page. A near-working version appeared quickly, but reaching a usable beta took further revision and fixes; the beta still has errors.

5 October 2026 · 2 min read

Is Cursor Composer a Cheaper Vibe Coding Option?

Abdul Osama (عبدول أسامة) recommends trying Cursor Composer if you want to lower the cost of AI-assisted coding without committing to one tool. He compares its quality and price favorably with other coding tools, but the video does not provide prices or test details to verify that comparison.

5 October 2026 · 1 min read

Fear of Claude, ChatGPT, and Other AI Tools

The video's message is not to let fear of AI tools hold you back. It names Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Gemini, but offers no tutorial or comparison.

5 October 2026 · 1 min read